Postural sensorimotor training versus sham exercise in physiotherapy of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: An exploratory randomised controlled trial.

PloS one. 2018;13(3):e0193358

Plain language summary

Chronic low back pain is a leading cause of years lived with disability. Sensorimotor training (SMT) involves exercises that retrain the musculo-skeletal system to reduce muscular imbalance and improve proprioception. SMT has become a popular method for low back pain rehabilitation, however no study has looked into its effectiveness when supplemented with physiotherapy. The aim of this exploratory randomised trial was to investigate the effects of SMT in rehabilitation of chronic low back pain in 22 patients. Two trial arms received 9x30 minute physiotherapy sessions supplemented with either 15 minutes SMT or 15 minutes low-intensity training as control. Pain level and functional status were assessed at baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention and 4-week follow-up. This trial found that in patients with chronic low back pain, SMT provided no added benefit to pain reduction and functional improvement compared with control. Based on these findings the authors suggest potential benefits of SMT for long-term functional status but further larger trials with increased SMT sessions are needed to better understand this association.

Abstract

Sensorimotor training (SMT) is popularly applied as exercise in rehabilitation settings, particularly for musculoskeletal pain. With insufficient evidence on its effect on pain and function, this exploratory randomised controlled trial investigated the potential effects of SMT in rehabilitation of chronic non-specific low back pain. Two arms received 9x30 minutes physiotherapy with added interventions: The experimental arm received 15 minutes of postural SMT while the comparator arm performed 15 minutes of added sub-effective low-intensity training. A treatment blinded tester assessed outcomes at baseline 2-4 days prior to intervention, pre- and post-intervention, and at 4-week follow-up. Main outcomes were pain and functional status assessed with a 0-100mm visual analogue scale and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Additionally, postural control was analysed using a video-based tracking system and a pressure plate during perturbed stance. Robust, nonparametric multivariate hypothesis testing was performed. 22 patients (11 females, aged 32 to 75 years) with mild to moderate chronic pain and functional limitations were included for analysis (11 per arm). At post-intervention, average values of primary outcomes improved slightly, but not to a clinically relevant or statistically significant extent. At 4-week follow-up, there was a significant improvement by 12 percentage points (pp) on the functional status questionnaire in the SMT-group (95% confidence intervall (CI) = 5.3pp to 17.7pp, p < 0.001) but not in the control group (4 pp improvement, CI = 11.8pp to 19.2pp). However, group-by-time interaction effects for functional status (Q = 3.3, 19 p = 0.07) and pain (Q = 0.84, p = 0.51) were non-significant. Secondary kinematic outcomes did not change over time in either of the groups. Despite significant improvement of functional status after SMT, overall findings of this exploratory study suggest that SMT provides no added benefit for pain reduction or functional improvement in patients with moderate chronic non-specific low back pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02304120 and related study protocol, DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-382.

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Neurological
Patient Centred Factors : Mediators/Low back pain
Environmental Inputs : Physical exercise
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Exercise and movement
Functional Laboratory Testing : Not applicable
Bioactive Substances : Nociceptors

Methodological quality

Jadad score : 3
Allocation concealment : Yes

Metadata